If You Have Filed A Propecia® Sexual Side Effects Claim In New York (Federal) District Court — Check In With Your Lawyer BEFORE May 11, 2015

This is — to be fair — a very smallish subset of the finasteride cases, but if you see your case number listed below, do get in touch with your lawyer.

The motions to dismiss in these cases are up on May 11, 2015 — and absent a response from your lawyer(s), each is very likely to be granted.

. . . .Any response to the defendants’ motions to dismiss ((18 in 1:14-cv-03974-JG-VVP, 26 in 1:14-cv-02277-JG-VVP, 27 in 1:14-cv-02248-JG-VVP, 18 in 1:14-cv-03956-JG-VVP, 26 in 1:14-cv-03622-JG-VVP, 18 in 1:14-cv-03975-JG-VVP, 37 in 1:13-cv-05172-JG-VVP, 233 in 1:12-md-02331-JG-VVP, 87 in 1:12-cv-02047-JG-VVP, 26 in 1:14-cv-02272-JG-VVP, 24 in 1:14-cv-03791-JG-VVP, 26 in 1:14-cv-03086-JG-VVP, 22 in 1:14-cv-03588-JG-VVP, 27 in 1:14-cv-02246-JG-VVP, 26 in 1:14-cv-02232-JG-VVP, 18 in 1:14-cv-03957-JG-VVP, 26 in 1:14-cv-02677-JG-VVP) is due by May 11, 2015. . . .

In the wider sexual side-effects MDL, discovery battles still predominate (as they did on New Years’ Day 2015). The central issue is whether scads of source files — or just summaries of them — will be turned over. And it is still being hashed out, with the Magistrate Judge primarily. We will keep you informed. Have a great night, one and all.


There are no comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: